Pages

Saturday, July 22, 2017

We Have Met the Enemy and He is Us

The headline for John Hawkins' latest column says it all: "A Column Most People Will Hate: We are the Real Reason Politics is Screwed Up in America."  Hawkins calls us all out for bemoaning the state of the country as if we had nothing to do with it.  Everybody has his favorite scapegoats.  The left blames corporations, Fox News, the alt-right, lobbyists, Citizens United and, most of all, Donald Trump.  The right blames the media, Maxine Waters, universities, the "Deep State," globalists, RINOs and Never Trumpers.  But the actual culprit is staring at us in the mirror every morning.

None of the institutions or people we blame for screwing up America could have any influence without at least the tacit acceptance of the American people.  Some of us through corruption, some through laziness, and most of us through some combination of the two, have put all these actors in power.  And its not even a recent phenomenon.

The hard truth is that a republic does not run on autopilot.  It can only thrive through the serious engagement of an informed, skeptical and moral electorate.  Benjamin Franklin said as much at the close of the Constitutional Convention.  A woman famously asked him whether the delegates had given the United States a republic or a monarchy.  Franklin's response, "A republic, if you can keep it."  Unfortunately we underestimate the commitment required to "keep" a republic.

A citizen of a republic cannot outsource his responsibility to internalize and zealously defend the principles that undergird it.  For the United States, those principles are contained mainly in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  Sadly, popular ignorance of both these documents has become so commonplace as to pass without notice.  And even those who have some passing familiarity with the Constitution are content to let the courts tell us what it means instead of reading and thinking for themselves.

Even more damaging are those who put their own material interests or ideological fervor ahead of adherence to the supreme law of the land.  This has always been a danger but it grew into a systemic cancer with the FDR administration.  In the 1930's a substantial majority of the people were frightened into vesting the federal government with vast powers never contemplated by the Constitution.  The Supreme Court abetted this process by "reinterpreting" the commerce clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

Having conferred expansive powers on the federal government, the voters felt justified in using them against their fellow citizens in order to benefit themselves.  The main qualification for any politician was his ability to loot the treasury on behalf of his constituents, or to advantage those constituents through the imposition of onerous regulations on whomever they blamed for their circumstances.  In the rush to seize advantage for themselves, the oath that every officeholder must take to support the Constitution was forgotten.  After all, the Constitution no longer really meant anything anyway.

Decades before we traded our birthright for a bowl of stew, President James Garfield put the responsibility for this country's well-being exactly where it belongs:
"Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature."
There have always been those who put their own selfish interests ahead of the good of the country.  In 1776 Samuel Adams addressed such people and sought to ostracize them from the body of responsible citizens:
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Unfortunately, those people are now running the show.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Bastille Day



I love Twitchy.  It's a regular stop on my daily cruise through the world wide web.  Every day there are leftists proudly tweeting their idiocy to the whole world.  Twitchy collects the best of these brainless emissions and highlights them for the rest of us to enjoy.  But this post from earlier today left me smh, as the kids say:

"July 14 is Bastille Day, the French national holiday that celebrates the beginning of republican democracy in France and the end of tyrannical rule."

I don't know if the French actually believe this, but I think we in this country should be clear about the French Revolution.  The storming of the Bastille did not usher in "the beginning of republican democracy in France and the end of tyrannical rule."  Bastille Day was followed by the Terror, Bonaparte and the Bourbon Restoration, not the end of tyranny.  To the extent the French Revolution resulted in democracy, it certainly wasn't a republican democracy as envisaged by the leaders of the American Revolution and the framers of the Constitution.  The French Revolution devolved quickly into a mobocracy, embodying all the worst characteristics of democracy that the framers endeavored to forestall.f

The writers at Twitchy should choose their words more carefully, particularly when taking Andrea Mitchell to task for her historical illiteracy.